346 Comments

OSU played without a head coach in the 2023 game, as well.

Expand full comment

Well played :)

Expand full comment

I see what you did there.

Expand full comment

Remember to “like” for more outstanding content.

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

You should have your own sports column. Too funny…

Expand full comment

Listen up... it was funny. I will give him that. But it's a sentence. One sentence. Let's not get carried away with this sports column business. 😂😂😂

Expand full comment

Former news reporter here, John. I can provide longer clips to prove my worthiness to write sports columns—but I’d rather not accept the demotion. ;-)

Expand full comment

Beaver fan here and this is "almost" accurate Jeff. We played with less than a coach so to speak, We would have been better off if J. Smith had simply flown out to East Lansing on Wednesday to announce his decision on Thursday morning. It might have given the Beavs a chance to get more jacked up just to give him the proverbial middle finger by winning the game on Friday night.

Expand full comment

I’m afraid we were losing that one regardless, Kent. But we may have been more competitive with the extra juice his early departure would have provided, to be sure.

Expand full comment

Very true...

Expand full comment

Not that it made a difference.

Expand full comment

I'm more disappointed. I could care less about the ducks or hearing anything about the ducks. I read in the Oregon Stater some history. In the late 50's when Oregon was the "little brother", the Pacific Coast Conference broke up and OSU was invited to stay with the big guys. Oregon State declined to leave their little brother behind. Oregon on the other hand would not repay the kindness and instead opted for the greedy path and break up of the Pac 12.

Expand full comment

My friend is the editor of that magazine. She said that discovering that anecdote, at that moment, was pretty amazing... and it went down as expected with everyone who read it. I hadn't heard it before either.

Expand full comment

Yep, we all still have the same priorities we had in the age of leather helmets. And, the world is no different than it was then. Oregon State's last Rose Bowl team was 3-1 in conference standings....hmm, maybe we should go back to that?

Expand full comment

Oh...you mean values right?

Expand full comment

It’s a major indictment of USC and UCLA that there doesn’t appear to have been any similar effort to keep the California rivalry games running with Cal and Stanford.

Expand full comment

I am going to let those schools worry about themselves/

Expand full comment

I wouldn't assume Cal and Stanford are interested in playing those two. There's a lot of bitterness and not much scheduling need speaking from the Cal fan side of things.

Expand full comment

Especially between Cal and UCLA.

Basically every UC system school hates UCLA. They're arrogant turds.

Expand full comment

That’s rich. Berkeley has always looked down on the Baby Bears. And then UCLA surpassed them big time.

Expand full comment

I have no dog in the fight, but I know UCLA lobbied hard to keep other UCs from moving to to the FBS with the argument that 2 was enough and more would split the talent and funding too much. Then they abandoned Cal.

They're just seen as a conniving and undehanded program within the UC system.

Cal are a bunch of academic snobs, sure, but they're not the ones with the history of screwing over the other UCs athletic programs.

Expand full comment

I think you have it a tad wrong. Cal and UCLA are part of the UC system. It’s common knowledge they (and USC) wanted no part of SDSU (CSU system) in the PAC 12.

It’s been the Aztecs’ goal since leaving the PCAA in the late 1970s.

I suppose Fresno State and SJSU (CSU BCS teams) coveted the P12, but I doubt they were considered at all until the recent exodus.

The only other UC school to play football is UC Davis of FCS.

Expand full comment

I didn't bring up SDSU or SJSU.

Expand full comment

I would think Cal and Stanford do have a scheduling need, since they are going from a conference that played 9 games to one that only plays 8. Seems to work perfectly for them to match up with OSU/WSU to fill each other's void.

The part about OSU trying to play Virginia makes zero sense though. It means a cross-country trip and I skeptical that Virginia is going to fill Reser Stadium (they are about on par with Purdue, who play there next year).

Expand full comment

Travel for one game further away has frequently happened for Pac12 schools. Texas, Hawaii, Ohio and many other places. One game in Virginia is not abnormal.

Expand full comment

I"m assuming Cal plays Oregon State in 2024-25-sounds like it's nearly a done deal. It's possible that Cal would have a need in 2026 for another game but it's cross country travel for ACC makes many think that Cal should schedule schedule winnable games. It already plays at Florida in 2026 so it doesn't have a burning need for another Power 2 opponent IMO.

Expand full comment

Yep. They were so fracking important before that we ended up with the strange inter-division scheduling. Now not so important.

Expand full comment

I have a hard time believing Cal-UCLA won't end up being scheduled regularly once everything shakes out.

Expand full comment

USC and UCLA will play each other in B1G. Cal and State Stanford are facing off in the ACC. Sigh. Those are the big rivalries.

But definitely could see them playing in the future. If the UC system stuck its nose in on Calimony, why not demand they play?

Expand full comment

Glad it’s going to continue but it won’t feel the same as a November game when the stakes are much higher.

Expand full comment

The weather will be much better!!

Expand full comment

And school has not started yet. How many students will show up early?

Expand full comment

It will never be the same, and not only because of when it's being played. And eventually when the fans realize it and stop caring (seems like some already have) then the schools will probably realize there is no longer an economic benefit to playing each other and decide to move on.

Expand full comment

Agreed. While I applaud the effort to continue the “tradition,” the dux chose to move on, thereby signaling their lack of concern regarding tradition. And what of the other rivalry sports? OSU vs. UO basketball? Baseball? Hell, the dux didn’t even have a program until the Beavs won the CWS. Will these rivalries die on the vine after this year? Highly, highly likely.

Jeanie (next post) makes an excellent observation as well in that school won’t actually begin until about two weeks after the game, so what kind of student turnout will there even be? And on Sept. 14, temperatures could be in the 80’s, maybe higher. Sorry, but that ain’t Civil War football. No, the tradition is over.

Expand full comment

Just relaaaax, Beaver fans. Bide your time. College football as we know it is a ticking time bomb. Change will come and you’ll be afforded an opportunity to rejoin the top tier. In the meantime, scheduling UO will help keep the program relevant and top of mind.

Expand full comment

As a Beaver fan, I'm still very torn about this. I get that it helps the program in a time of need to schedule a true Power 4 opponent, but I don't like the thought of giving Oregon an "out" here when they played a role in killing the Pac-12. At least next year's game should be competitive with both teams replacing several starters on both sides of the ball.

Expand full comment

From an OSU standpoint... strictly OSU... it is a big help to have 7 home games to sell next season. Gives them a huge advantage at a time that they need it.

Expand full comment

It's still garbage.

The Ducks helped bankrupt OSU. Now OSU has to play them on even less equal footing.

It's like your neighbor offering you breadcrumbs after they burned your house down.

Expand full comment

...and then urinating on the smoldering ruins.

Expand full comment

Finally...something you'd be good at, Chuckie...

Expand full comment

Harrumph!!!! If I weren’t so old, along with the squeezed plumbing problems that result, I might possibly be a half-decent pisser, too!

Expand full comment

You're one of the best, Monte...keep firing away!

Expand full comment

Ego te absolvo.

Expand full comment

Stola ekta colo...

Expand full comment

You guys are acting like 5 yr olds.

Expand full comment

Take the breadcrumbs and use them to stuff a roast duck.

Expand full comment

How do you figure PSU is “bankrupt?” You are arbitrarily assigning bad karma to your own team before we even know how things will shake out.

Expand full comment

Nice strawman argument. "Arbitrarily assigning bad karma", no, the ducks did that with the other schools that destroyed the conference and significantly destroyed their athletic program revenue stream. As to how things will shake out, it's quite apparent things will not be as they were as they don't even have a new conference to play in.

Those are called facts.

Expand full comment

If they were currently “bankrupt” I would acknowledge the truth of what you say. But they are NOT. Give your team a fighting chance before you go around pronouncing them dead! Even the litigation is not final. The ongoing changes in the NCAA are not final.

Expand full comment

Shutup shill.

Expand full comment

And a big help going forward. With Washington off the schedule, there is no other team that will provide anywhere near the value and profile as an opponent that will come to Reser at all, much less on a regular basis, as Oregon will.

Expand full comment

They can take their profile and put it where the sun doesn't shine.

Expand full comment

I hope the people who are calling for OSU to NOT play Oregon are also planning to write checks to OSU to cover the large loss of revenue they will suffer AND write checks to the NIL to cover the additional amount that will have to be paid to recruits AND write checks to pay for what it will cost to get the replacement game televised AND write checks to the area businesses that support and buy advertising from Oregon State AND write checks to the university to subsidize admissions for the lost enrollments AND write checks to the employees who won't get paid as much, or even get to work at all at a game against a lower level program. And then write some more checks to cover other collateral losses.

Because that is EXACTLY what will be required to offset doing long term damage to the program, the university, and numerous others, that not being fiscally responsible will do.

Expand full comment

The delta between the game revenue for playing knight school versus scheduling a different team, isn't going to be the make or break factor in OSU's athletic budget or the economy of Corvallis. If it is, there isn't a check big enough that you, I, or anybody not named Phil could write to OSU to fix that. But it isn't.

Expand full comment

I agree, Chuck. Beavs could definitely regularly schedule teams that would result in a sellout. We don’t need the Quacks for that, and surrounding businesses could also benefit from fans who travel to watch the games.fans coming to

Expand full comment

They don’t care about their team or the school, Andy. And I bet few of them who complain so loudly have given a dime to athletics, except for maybe a game ticket. They would love nothing more than to see miserable failure for the Beavers so they could cry “I told you so, and it’s all the Ducks fault!!”

Expand full comment

That's the Ducks' great fear, isn't it? How this all looks to the greater state of Oregon? How this affects their beloved "brand"? Don't worry, that's already in cement.

Expand full comment

Not sure how this is an "out" for UO. They had to sacrifice a home game to make it happen. Seems more like UO charity.

Expand full comment

whoregon attempting to spray Febreze on the stank of the putrid optics of what they've done.

Expand full comment

Because Oregon clearly doesn't care that much about the Civil War. If they did, they wouldn't have bolted from the Pac-12 for a Big 10 half-share.

Expand full comment

Not at all. They need a quality home game in odd years where they only get 4 B1G home games, and this fills that need.

Expand full comment

Exactly. The BigTen takes into consideration for non-conference scheduling the seasons there are either four, or five, home conference games. For example, in 2023 Iowa had 5, and played Iowa State on the road. In 2024, they have 4 and will host Iowa State.

Expand full comment

It's not "charity." It's cashing in a home game in 2024 that they didn't need (they get 5 Big Ten games at home, plus an extra OOC home game because they are playing at Hawaii) in exchange for a home game in 2025 when they will only get 4 Big Ten games at home.

Expand full comment

How is a game with OSU an

“Out” for Oregon? They had their schedule set already, didn’t need to do this, but made the effort for the sake of the rivalry and the state of Oregon.

Expand full comment

With friends like the Ducks…

Expand full comment

Finally some good news!

Expand full comment

What? You can save $500 in 15 minutes?

Expand full comment

I still don't like what happened to get us here. But I love that they worked hard to continue the series. I am grateful for that. #GoBeavs

Expand full comment

No thanks.

The Ducks don't deserve the game.

Expand full comment

Lol... the typical dismissiveness of a spoiled brat fan base always makes me laugh.

Expand full comment

He's culturally appropriating "The Real Rich's" vapid vernacular.

Expand full comment

Lived in Iowa for a few years and witnessed the in-state CyHawk rivalry build-up. It reminded me of the Civil War. Clothing, sporting goods, and grocery stores were full of Iowa State and University of Iowa gear. Other stores had window fronts decorated. This was also a September game between two teams in different conferences. Neither team had an in-conference rival that generated similar enthusiasm. This is good for the State of Oregon.

Expand full comment

That game was renewed after 43 years of not playing. 5 of the first 6 games after renewal were played at Iowa because Iowa State had a small stadium. All the fans thought Iowa would kick Iowa State's ass due to disparity in programs. Iowa State won 4 of the 6 including 3 at Iowa. The status of the Iowa St program at the time was like Group of 5. It wasn't Big8 vs Big10. It was little brother vs big brother, and little brother had the juice. Didn't take long for people to ask, "43 years? What the hell were we thinking."

Expand full comment

The big difference is that both Iowa and Iowa State are still in P4 conferences.

You don't here much about the Iowa, Northern Iowa rivalry do you? How about the Ohio State/University of Ohio Rivalry? Arkansas/Arkansas State? There's a reason you don't.

Expand full comment

Those schools don't play annually. They don't have the juice of an annual rivalry. But, for example, in 2009 Iowa hosted Northern Iowa the first game of the season. Iowa won by 1 point after blocking a field goal from Northern Iowa as time expired. That Iowa team escaped, and finished the season in the Orange Bowl. They've played 3 more times in the last 14 seasons, two were close. FCS N. Dakota State beat Iowa 23-21 at Iowa in 2016. Conference affiliation did't mean a whole lot.

Expand full comment

Those rivalries don't exist, period, and there's a reason why. Sure you can find a single game every once in a blue moon. App St beating Michigan at the Big House, James Madison beating Nick Saban and Alabama in Tuscaloosa, but those are outliers, not the norm. Not to mention, all of what you just mentioned happened before the media dollar gaps got so HUGE, and before NIL and the transfer portal. If you understand any of this at all, you'll see how the circumstances are not the same as they were back then, and all the key players on those underdog rosters that upset or played the big boys tough, wouldn't have even been on those rosters in today's game. Those lower level schools can't pay them enough to keep them and the rules don't restrict players from leaving for better opportunities. So yeah, David slayed Goliath with a sling shot a few thousand years ago, but it hasn't happened since, and especially not since the invention of the automatic rifle.

Expand full comment

True. Circumstances facing programs aren't the same. That's why USC & UCLA, then Colorado, then Arizona, then UW/UO, then Utah, ASU did what they did.

Expand full comment

I get it, but it didn't have to be that way. Such shirt sightedness on our commissioners and school presidents, including OSU and WSU. John has already pointed out that with the LA schools, the Pac12 would have garnered at least $40 mill per school. SC and fICLA thought they were worth more than the others, which true. The market has proven that. So in the interest of fairness, each of the other 10 schools put $2 mil of their $40+ mil in the kitty. That's $20 mil right there. You give SC $15 mil of that and fUCLA the other $5 mil. Now, SC is getting $55 mil a year. Not quite the $60 mil the big 10 is getting but close enough that it's still a better deal when you add in the additional travel for all sports where the ducks went on record saying it will be an additional $10 mil a year in travel. So SC is actually getting more net than they're getting now in the big 10. fUCLA is getting $45 mil a year. Take the $10 mil in extra travel into consideration, and they're only off $5 mil. Not enough to walk and with SC happy, there is no partner for fUCLA to move with and the Cal board of regents would never approve them splitting from Cal.

That would leave the other 10 schools getting AT LEAST $38 mil a year. More than the ducks and UW are getting from the big 10, plus the $10 mil in reduced travel. That's the equivalent of $48 mil a year to them in the big 10. Again, at the best estimate that's still more than they'll make in the big 10.

As for the 4 corner schools, they're only getting $32 mil a year in the Big 12 and Furd and Cal are getting ZERO from the ACC. So the Pac 12 would've been the 3rd best funded P5 conference and every single school would've been getting more than they will be getting next year.

Before you say this is all hindsight and it's always 20/20, no its not. These figures were projected long before anyone left, by Bob Thompson who John has used as a source many times, and has been right on the money every time. So in reality, the schools that left created a problem that didn't have to be, and it all started with SC and fUCLA.

Expand full comment

If pigs had wings they might resemlbe robins for some people I suppose. Can you imagine the uproar in Seattle this year if USC and UCLA had that much more coming from the Pac12 including a subsidy from UW? Thompson's projections were based on USC sticking around, and USC did NOT want to stick around regardless of money from the Pac12. How do we know that? Because they approached the BigTen in SECRET rather than ask the Pac12 for a subsidy. They wanted one decision path, not a choice.

And while we're flying your false flag, what would have kept Oregon, Washington, Utah from asking for their own tier....thereby demanding more money from OSU and WSU? That would be 5 hands into OSU's pocket.

Expand full comment

I'm not interested in being Oregon's charity game once a year. If we can stay competitive fine but it's hard to see that happening. Oregon wants to be a midwest team so let them start a rivalry with Iowa or something.

Expand full comment

As a MD native and Terrapins fan, the only positive out of this whole realignment disaster is that I'll be able to go to Eugene and see the Terps in person next year for the first time since they played OSU in a bowl game in SF (which I think was 2007).

Expand full comment

It will likely be the only time that can occur given the voracious actions of the "elites" to eliminate what they consider imposters. I think you'll have a better chance to see your beloved "turtles" playing in Corvallis than Eugene in the coming years.

Expand full comment

That's fine. Any chance I get to see them without having to leave the NW is good with me.

Expand full comment

Oregon already has a rivalry game in the " big ten" against Washington for the season finale.

Expand full comment

I’m happy. September be damned. So much fun. 😎

Expand full comment

only fun if competitive. It won't be.

Expand full comment

You’re not looking at the big picture. It’s not ALL about W-L. Each game is an experience to be enjoyed. The pre game routine, the walk to the stadium, entering to see the bright colors of the competing teams, the band, the dogs, the beer, the fans, the hope, the disappointment, the “maybe next year” or the “we got em today.” THAT’S what it’s about.

Expand full comment

I guess you and I are in sports for different reasons. I go to a sports event to watch cheer my team to win. If my team is so uncompetitive that it can't possibly win, I will find something better to do with my weekend afternoon. I think I am in the massive majority on this. But you do you.

Expand full comment

A fan is never realistic. Fan, short for fanatic. I enjoy winning as much as anyone. My experience with sports doesn’t revolve around national relevance. I grew up in the Bay Area. Been in Oregon since 1971. I’ve kept my childhood teams as favorites. I’ve seen the Giants, 49ers in the bottom of the standings and with the winners trophy. Along the way I’ve seen the Blazers suck and play as good as anyone. I became a Beaver fan in the early 80’s along with my association with OSU’s agriculture dept. Turf grass to be exact. I’ve watched them loose and win. I’m a fan. I’ll wait to see how the book progresses in the next chapter. All the while being a fan and cheering the young men and women of OSU. Have a nice day.

Expand full comment

Love this perspective David!

Expand full comment

There is a big difference between watching a given team, down on its luck, like the Blazers or even the 1980s vintage Beavers football team, and two teams at completely different levels of competition, like Oregon and OSU (next year and on). Whereas the Giants or Blazers are still in the "big leagues" and so receive the same opportunity to draft players (with an advantage picking first) and the same income as their opponents, this is not true for the Beavers. They have been relegated to a lower level of competition, with less ability to recruit top players (and they don't get to pick first like in the majors), with much less income and donations with which to attract players. They are in a lower level league going forward with much less media exposure, lower level bowl games and no real chance to compete for the national title. It is essentially like a minor league baseball team, even if Triple A, having to compete with a major league team. They have next to no chance (might beat the major league team 1 out of 100). So you do not make a compelling argument.

Expand full comment

I’m not here to offer you a compelling argument. I’m a fan of the university and it’s athletic department. Maybe you should move your loyalty 45 miles south so you can be in your big show. We won’t miss ya. 👋

Expand full comment

You really know it all don’t ya?

Expand full comment

You overstate your assumption that you are in the majority. I feel you may be in the vocal minority. But neither of us can back that up so, I agree you do you. Always leaves to rake!

Expand full comment

Nothing you say will turn these crybaby Beaver fans from cutting their nose off to spite their face. They are intent in trashing their own school by forecasting the death of Beaver football before their team even has a chance to attempt reorganization. It’s really sad that they are hoping their prophetic demise of their team comes to pass so they can scream “I told you so!”

Expand full comment

Totally with ya. I started watching PAC 8 sports 70 years ago at a Stanford track meet. My dad was a polevalter back in the 20’s so he liked Track. I hate to see the PAC 12 die but it did. However I’ll be a fan of what’s next. No sense bitchen.

Expand full comment

The Ducks and other schools have relegated the Beavs to third world status in college football revenue, thereby cutting them down at the knees. It won't be as competitive in the past, which is why the Ducks helped kill OSU's future to gain a monopoly on P5 now Power 4 football in the state for their own greed. The Beavers dug out of their Gary Anderson grave just to be killed again. This game will never be competitive again.

Expand full comment