64 Comments
User's avatar
A. J.'s avatar

The punishment should fit the crime. In this case, it obviously does not.

Expand full comment
John Canzano's avatar

Agree.

Expand full comment
Rob's avatar

I just don’t get how a player can still play after a domestic dispute but an unemployed player bets on some games and is ostracized by the league.

Expand full comment
John Canzano's avatar

The suspension is just weird. Legal wager. Not under contract at the time. Facing a punishment that doesn't make sense... while the same league allows domestic violence offenders to suit up.

Expand full comment
Grant's dad's avatar

sounds like a great lawsuit to me...unequal punishment. amongst other things.

Expand full comment
Jon Goodman's avatar

I can't believe this isn't a bigger story, it should be reported on nationally. This is just nuts.

Expand full comment
John Canzano's avatar

It soon will be. Watch.

Expand full comment
Tricia Crismon's avatar

I’m speechless yet not really surprised. Hopefully your article brings his story to the attention of someone who can rectify the problem!

Expand full comment
Kenneth Fischer's avatar

They never talk about how many sports owners own pieces of Draft kings and fanduel.

Expand full comment
John Canzano's avatar

They're all benefitting.

Expand full comment
Charlie Payne's avatar

Excellent expose, John. It’s about the arrogance of power. It’s time for the players to take action on behalf of this minor leaguer. Or perhaps the players operate under the “I got mine, let him get his own” philosophy.

Expand full comment
David Gulickson's avatar

Where would this go if Bayer has a nuts-on, 100 mph fastball?

Yup

“Hypocrisy” is NewSpeak for “Professional Athletics”

GO DAWGS

Expand full comment
Al's avatar

Nicely done JC . MLB gambling rules are vital. But MLB needs a wake-up call. Do they uderstand that what happend to the PGA via LIV became reality in large part because of rigid and blockheaded thinking by PGA ruling crowd? When things become unreasonable change ocurrs and the offending group loses. What you described is unreasonable.

Expand full comment
John Canzano's avatar

The fact that he's ineligible... three years later... is ridiculous.

Expand full comment
Maverick's avatar

Absolutely ridiculous. Guy doesn't have any affiliation with professional baseball in any way shape or form because MLB left him on his own to survive. Then he gets hired back and this crap. I stopped watching MLB at the beginning of the pandemic when billionaire owners couldn't get agreement with millionaire players on how to navigate play during the global crisis. They are like Keystone Kops on this one. If I were prominent attorney who specialized in large corporate employees C - Level cases... I'd take this one for free and sue MLB's a$$ off. And I'd win the case and free publicity!

Expand full comment
Thom Koshinsky's avatar

remind me? What law did he break, since he was no longer under contract to anyone? Does this mean if a college athlete takes up baseball and has the gift, baseball can look and find out in his pat he gambled on baseball games he would not be allowed ?

Expand full comment
John Canzano's avatar

MLB says he violated the terms of his agreement... that even as his contract was "suspended" he was still required to follow their rules. He agrees with that. Thinks that the one-year suspension should have sufficed. It's just messy.

Expand full comment
Thom Koshinsky's avatar

So,, being under "suspension", he is still under the same rules as anyone else, as someone else pointed out, what if he were a top talent....

Expand full comment
Pedro in Texas's avatar

Pete Rose?

Wait, Pete who?

Expand full comment
Thom Koshinsky's avatar

Pete is still eligible for the HOF if he gets voted in, his name has been on all the ballots

Expand full comment
John Luttrell's avatar

Obviously to all of us except MLB, Bauer got hosed. MLB has to get these punishments organized based on the seriousness of the “crime.” MLB also has to quit making the game more and more vanilla! If you can’t hit against the shift, learn to and by the way, learn to bunt! I kind of get the pitch clock but only allowing two tosses to first base is stupid. And increasing the size of the bases is ridiculous. Next MLB will say the dimensions of all ball parks have to be the same! Stupid is as stupid does.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Feb 16, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
John Luttrell's avatar

Yep, me as well after baseball. Ten men, sometimes four outfielders, sometimes five infielders tons of fun but it wasn’t baseball. It’s like comparing tennis to pickle ball. Lol

Expand full comment
Maverick's avatar

Don't agree with the tennis/pickleball comparison. If you have played tennis and tried pickle ball it's not even close. Pickleball is closer to ping pong without a table. 😎

Expand full comment
John Luttrell's avatar

I’m referring to baseball vs. softball. It’s completely relevant to tennis/pickle ball. Baseball is the standard as Is tennis vs pickle ball.

Expand full comment
Maverick's avatar

I'm not married to my position, but I have played tennis at a high level and pickle ball... not the same as fastball v softball. Watch some women's softball and you'll see... top class sport, elite athletes. Eddie Feigner made MLB hitters look silly striking them out from 2nd base. 😎 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaV1eep_VlM

Expand full comment
Thom Koshinsky's avatar

I remember

Expand full comment
Steve Rees's avatar

John - you have hit the hypocrisy nail on the head. Why is it that there is no common sense when interpreting rules that leave so much to interpretation?

Expand full comment
Mark Friel's avatar

Great story John. Couldn’t agree more. All the major leagues tolerate so much worse than sports betting.

Expand full comment
Jim Stewart's avatar

Hypocrisy is, indeed, the operative word here.

Expand full comment
ChrisTom's avatar

Bauer remains a free agent after getting cut by the Dodgers, presumably after they figured out no one else wanted him.

It is dumb, however, that he's been reinstated while this kid has not. Kenesaw Mountain Landis would probably see this situation as just and fair, but it's not 1923 anymore.

Expand full comment
Chris Pilotti's avatar

MLB needs to do this to justify keeping Pete Rose out of the Hall. Ironically nowadays gambling is a money maker for the MLB, NBA and NFL.

Expand full comment
Maverick's avatar

Nailed it Chris Pilotti... they are waiting for Charlie Hustle to die so they don't look so vindictive every time his name comes up. http://twsthewrightstuff.blogspot.com/2015/02/a-red-rose-in-hall-thorns-and-all.html

Expand full comment
Thom Koshinsky's avatar

Wrong, Pete is eligible for the Hall if they vote him in

Expand full comment
Maverick's avatar

Well, one of us is wrong. But his name ain't Maverick. He is not eligible to go on the ballot. "Bartlett Giamatti after an investigation into whether Rose bet on baseball games, including those involving the Reds teams for which he played and coached. Part of the settlement included a lifetime ban from baseball, which also makes him ineligible to appear on the hall of fame ballot." The Pete Rose Rule has never been overturned. What say you John Canzano?

Expand full comment
John Luttrell's avatar

Big difference. Remember se was involved and employed with mlb.

Expand full comment
Brad Weekly's avatar

The ubiquity of wagering on sport in the US is staggering - as it has been in nations around the world for many years. You can agree or disagree if sports wagering is healthy for people or communities - but you cannot have it both ways. Manfred comes off as tone deaf here.

Expand full comment