MLB says he violated the terms of his agreement... that even as his contract was "suspended" he was still required to follow their rules. He agrees with that. Thinks that the one-year suspension should have sufficed. It's just messy.
MLB says he violated the terms of his agreement... that even as his contract was "suspended" he was still required to follow their rules. He agrees with that. Thinks that the one-year suspension should have sufficed. It's just messy.
MLB says he violated the terms of his agreement... that even as his contract was "suspended" he was still required to follow their rules. He agrees with that. Thinks that the one-year suspension should have sufficed. It's just messy.
So,, being under "suspension", he is still under the same rules as anyone else, as someone else pointed out, what if he were a top talent....