How? They won't even make the tournament playing in the PAC12.
disagree
They'd have to run through the PAC12 with roughly 7 or fewer losses. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see it. They'd be competitive - but I don't see them raising the bar.
SDSU this year: 14 KenPom / 14 Net.
That's a big upgrade over the Pac-12's 3rd and 4th best teams this year:
USC: 43 KenPom / 50 Net
Oregon: 38 KenPom / 47 Net
USC squeaked in as a 10 seed and Oregon didn't make it at all.
Arizona and USC were both 14-6 in-conference, so if you think SDSU could match that playing in the PAC12 (I'm skeptical) then you're right - upgrade.
so, you don't think the Pac should have invited them? (assuming they have)
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
How? They won't even make the tournament playing in the PAC12.
disagree
They'd have to run through the PAC12 with roughly 7 or fewer losses. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see it. They'd be competitive - but I don't see them raising the bar.
SDSU this year: 14 KenPom / 14 Net.
That's a big upgrade over the Pac-12's 3rd and 4th best teams this year:
USC: 43 KenPom / 50 Net
Oregon: 38 KenPom / 47 Net
USC squeaked in as a 10 seed and Oregon didn't make it at all.
Arizona and USC were both 14-6 in-conference, so if you think SDSU could match that playing in the PAC12 (I'm skeptical) then you're right - upgrade.
so, you don't think the Pac should have invited them? (assuming they have)