wrong...firing over the refusal to be vaccinated, when it's now proven the vaccinations actually make a person more susceptible to contract COVID and it's variants is governmental over-reach and negligence by not doing their due diligence. I hope Rolovich is able to sue Inslee and the state for many many millions.
wrong...firing over the refusal to be vaccinated, when it's now proven the vaccinations actually make a person more susceptible to contract COVID and it's variants is governmental over-reach and negligence by not doing their due diligence. I hope Rolovich is able to sue Inslee and the state for many many millions.
Actually it's the opposite of "proven" that vaccinations make a person more susceptible to COVID. Just FYI, Gateway Pundit, the website who made that debunked claim, is not a credible source for science information. Second, Rolovich has no case. He violated the terms of his employment agreement. Then, after he was fired, made a bad faith claim that his Catholic beliefs prevented him from getting the vaccine. The Catholic church has no such prohibition.
"Not a credible source for science information"? AKA not approved by Fauci because it goes against the narrative. Never in American history has one side of a story been suppressed like we have experienced with the vaccines. Those with opposing views have had their careers destroyed. That should tell anyone with an open intelligent mind that there is a massive cover up. There are always two sides of a story, ALWAYS.
I could be wrong in this, but I think in the history of our nation it has only ever been the military that has required an injection (never tested on humans before mass release) into your body in exchange for employment
IтАЩm a 1st Gulf War veteran and myself and other vets took untested injections at that time (to protect against Anthrax). We later learned these injections were never FDA approved, and they were finally stopped in 2001
Thankfully I suffer no ill effects from those shots. But I know fellow vets who continue to suffer long term negative effects (Gulf War Illness) that we believe are attributed to jabs тАШfor our own goodтАЩ needed to fulfill that past govt. тАШemployment contractтАЩ
Rolovich was a collegiate coach in good physical shape. He should not have had to give any reason for refusing the jab other than citing what he/you and I enjoy under the Bill of Rights. He was the highest paid employee of State of Washington at the time, and I believe he was made an example of
Is the тАЬemployment agreementтАЭ a public record? Is there a specific clause in said тАЬagreementтАЭ where Rolovich agreed to take any vaccines in the event of a pandemic? If there is such a clause, then I agree he has no case. If there is no such clause, what тАЬtermsтАЭ of employment did he violate? Please be specific.
That's your opinion, not a fact. I did not refer to the "gateway pundit" You did! I got my information from several biologists and virologists. But you keep assuming you know everything. Admittedly Rolovich as a state employee is in a tight spot. But "if" he can prove the governor acted negligently and more importantly without proper information and facts...He may have a great case. YOU don't know whether or not he does, and neither do I. But YOU keep assuming, you know what ass-umptions do...right?
wrong...firing over the refusal to be vaccinated, when it's now proven the vaccinations actually make a person more susceptible to contract COVID and it's variants is governmental over-reach and negligence by not doing their due diligence. I hope Rolovich is able to sue Inslee and the state for many many millions.
Actually it's the opposite of "proven" that vaccinations make a person more susceptible to COVID. Just FYI, Gateway Pundit, the website who made that debunked claim, is not a credible source for science information. Second, Rolovich has no case. He violated the terms of his employment agreement. Then, after he was fired, made a bad faith claim that his Catholic beliefs prevented him from getting the vaccine. The Catholic church has no such prohibition.
"Not a credible source for science information"? AKA not approved by Fauci because it goes against the narrative. Never in American history has one side of a story been suppressed like we have experienced with the vaccines. Those with opposing views have had their careers destroyed. That should tell anyone with an open intelligent mind that there is a massive cover up. There are always two sides of a story, ALWAYS.
I could be wrong in this, but I think in the history of our nation it has only ever been the military that has required an injection (never tested on humans before mass release) into your body in exchange for employment
IтАЩm a 1st Gulf War veteran and myself and other vets took untested injections at that time (to protect against Anthrax). We later learned these injections were never FDA approved, and they were finally stopped in 2001
Thankfully I suffer no ill effects from those shots. But I know fellow vets who continue to suffer long term negative effects (Gulf War Illness) that we believe are attributed to jabs тАШfor our own goodтАЩ needed to fulfill that past govt. тАШemployment contractтАЩ
Rolovich was a collegiate coach in good physical shape. He should not have had to give any reason for refusing the jab other than citing what he/you and I enjoy under the Bill of Rights. He was the highest paid employee of State of Washington at the time, and I believe he was made an example of
Is the тАЬemployment agreementтАЭ a public record? Is there a specific clause in said тАЬagreementтАЭ where Rolovich agreed to take any vaccines in the event of a pandemic? If there is such a clause, then I agree he has no case. If there is no such clause, what тАЬtermsтАЭ of employment did he violate? Please be specific.
That's your opinion, not a fact. I did not refer to the "gateway pundit" You did! I got my information from several biologists and virologists. But you keep assuming you know everything. Admittedly Rolovich as a state employee is in a tight spot. But "if" he can prove the governor acted negligently and more importantly without proper information and facts...He may have a great case. YOU don't know whether or not he does, and neither do I. But YOU keep assuming, you know what ass-umptions do...right?