That's not been my experience. So, I can say with good authority that you are just flat out wrong in your all encompassing generalization of Attorneys. Maybe you need to grow a beard, live off the grid in Montana, and write a manifesto.
That's not been my experience. So, I can say with good authority that you are just flat out wrong in your all encompassing generalization of Attorneys. Maybe you need to grow a beard, live off the grid in Montana, and write a manifesto.
I imagine the leadership at OSU and WSU and all their fans, me included, are happy for lawyers and courts. If it was just rule of the majority (also called "mob rule"), which is the alternative, they would be screwed.
That's not been my experience. So, I can say with good authority that you are just flat out wrong in your all encompassing generalization of Attorneys. Maybe you need to grow a beard, live off the grid in Montana, and write a manifesto.
I imagine the leadership at OSU and WSU and all their fans, me included, are happy for lawyers and courts. If it was just rule of the majority (also called "mob rule"), which is the alternative, they would be screwed.
It depends to a great degree on how you define who gets to vote. Which coincidentally is what this case is about.
Montanans would prefer Oregonians, Californians and Washingtonians would grow their beards in their own states and leave Montana alone.