Discussion about this post

User's avatar
scforthewin's avatar

Dan Lanning is only 37. Lincoln Riley is 3 years older but has amassed a far more impressive resume as a HC. Unless Lanning coaches three consecutive playoff teams and three consecutive Heisman winners in the next three seasons he will not be where Riley is at age 40. And yet….after all that success….Riley had a very humbling season. His coaching was questioned, his culture, even his playcalling which would be heresy a year ago to even suggest. The thru line I see for both is hubris. Lanning is a bit of a blowhard and prone to really cringey moments. Riley can be quietly arrogant and a tad paranoid. Both could learn a bit of humility and in different ways I think this season will help. Both could learn a thing or two from guys like DeBoer and Kyle Whittingham.

I still think the trajectory of both is high. I’d hold my stock in both. You can’t shortcut experience and only with age comes wisdom. Growth thru pain and struggle. Both will be the better for it.

Expand full comment
Bill Mathews's avatar

If he needs “better defensive backs and pass rushers”, he can BUY THEM. I don’t recognize this sport any more.

Expand full comment
202 more comments...

No posts