In the long run hyper-inflation is not sustainable. College football programs cannot continue to overexpend trying to compete and be in the top 30. The sharks will consume 90% of the revenue and the crumbs will be left for the remaining 300 teams (including FCS) . By the way because so many teams compete for a spot in March Madness, ho…
In the long run hyper-inflation is not sustainable. College football programs cannot continue to overexpend trying to compete and be in the top 30. The sharks will consume 90% of the revenue and the crumbs will be left for the remaining 300 teams (including FCS) . By the way because so many teams compete for a spot in March Madness, how much tv money is distributed to an FCS basketball program? In the FCS model, the football budget is much smaller than FBS and thus more economically sustainable. And the FCS championship football games are much more exciting than watching a Tidy Bowl game with two 6-6 teams playing. Why not bite the bullet and drop down to FCS football. You can still be an NCAA top 10 team in basketball, baseball, softball, soccer, gymnastic etc.
In the long run hyper-inflation is not sustainable. College football programs cannot continue to overexpend trying to compete and be in the top 30. The sharks will consume 90% of the revenue and the crumbs will be left for the remaining 300 teams (including FCS) . By the way because so many teams compete for a spot in March Madness, how much tv money is distributed to an FCS basketball program? In the FCS model, the football budget is much smaller than FBS and thus more economically sustainable. And the FCS championship football games are much more exciting than watching a Tidy Bowl game with two 6-6 teams playing. Why not bite the bullet and drop down to FCS football. You can still be an NCAA top 10 team in basketball, baseball, softball, soccer, gymnastic etc.