LOL, you said the column was about Phil knight, yet you prattle on about sweat shops, targeted demographics, feigned racism (black mothers not being able to afford the shoes), and a shot at the U of O (not a national championship in CFB). USC=Hypocrisy, dishonesty and elitism...it's what's for dinner at the University of spoiled children.
LOL, you said the column was about Phil knight, yet you prattle on about sweat shops, targeted demographics, feigned racism (black mothers not being able to afford the shoes), and a shot at the U of O (not a national championship in CFB). USC=Hypocrisy, dishonesty and elitism...it's what's for dinner at the University of spoiled children.
Wow, now I remember you took the same childish shots at me when we had a difference of opinion. I don't agree with all that scforthewin said, but he is correct on many points. Complicated genius for sure. Dial it back Grant's dad... you are over your head in this discussion.
I could not disagree with you more. But I respect your right to make value judgments on other posters. That's your right. What are your business bona fides?
For a USC guy to question anyone's or any company's business ethics is laughable.
Between the nonstop patter of rain on his roof, and mostly the reverberated din coming from the echo chamber he lives in- Grants dad can not hear opposing ideals or even opinions. Someday poor Grant may ask his dad, тАЬwhatтАЩs a contrarian view, dad?тАЭ
Do you know the man or is this simply an off-the-wall dump on someone you do not know?
Do the words 'self-righteous' mean anything to you? How can you possibly judge someone by what they post?
And again, I respect your right to state your POV. I simply think that it is sad that people can no longer disagree without being disagreeable.
How many enterprises are USC graduates involved in that have exported their labor to nations with a lower cost of living and a lower cost of product creation and distribution?
LOL, you said the column was about Phil knight, yet you prattle on about sweat shops, targeted demographics, feigned racism (black mothers not being able to afford the shoes), and a shot at the U of O (not a national championship in CFB). USC=Hypocrisy, dishonesty and elitism...it's what's for dinner at the University of spoiled children.
Wow, now I remember you took the same childish shots at me when we had a difference of opinion. I don't agree with all that scforthewin said, but he is correct on many points. Complicated genius for sure. Dial it back Grant's dad... you are over your head in this discussion.
I could not disagree with you more. But I respect your right to make value judgments on other posters. That's your right. What are your business bona fides?
For a USC guy to question anyone's or any company's business ethics is laughable.
Between the nonstop patter of rain on his roof, and mostly the reverberated din coming from the echo chamber he lives in- Grants dad can not hear opposing ideals or even opinions. Someday poor Grant may ask his dad, тАЬwhatтАЩs a contrarian view, dad?тАЭ
Do you know the man or is this simply an off-the-wall dump on someone you do not know?
Do the words 'self-righteous' mean anything to you? How can you possibly judge someone by what they post?
And again, I respect your right to state your POV. I simply think that it is sad that people can no longer disagree without being disagreeable.
How many enterprises are USC graduates involved in that have exported their labor to nations with a lower cost of living and a lower cost of product creation and distribution?
Why do YOU make everything about YOU??? insecure much?