“But overall, student-athletes are in a better position today.”
Maybe, it would be interesting to conduct a longitudinal study and see if being in a better position, monetarily, from age 18-22 leads to better ‘life’ outcomes, or if the allure of money and being able to capitalize on themselves at such a young age leads to better outcomes …
“But overall, student-athletes are in a better position today.”
Maybe, it would be interesting to conduct a longitudinal study and see if being in a better position, monetarily, from age 18-22 leads to better ‘life’ outcomes, or if the allure of money and being able to capitalize on themselves at such a young age leads to better outcomes in the short term and worse outcomes over the long term.
“But overall, student-athletes are in a better position today.”
Maybe, it would be interesting to conduct a longitudinal study and see if being in a better position, monetarily, from age 18-22 leads to better ‘life’ outcomes, or if the allure of money and being able to capitalize on themselves at such a young age leads to better outcomes in the short term and worse outcomes over the long term.
Time will tell.
Comes down to how each school also
Educates these kids!
They are better at less schools... No way are the PAC2, Cal, Stanford, the future scrums of the destroyed acc, and G5 athletes in better positions