Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike's avatar

I may be in the minority here, but to me the primary value of announcers is less about narrating the event and more about providing insight on the things we aren't able to see on our screen. If the only view and sounds of the event announcers have is the exact same thing we get at home, then announcers' presence loses value to the point that they almost detract more from the event than add to it.

If FOX is all about cutting costs - and I can't imagine the cost of a couple plane tickets and a night in a hotel amounts to much in the grand scheme - then just do away with announcers altogether and pipe in the public address feed.

I would think if the conference is that unhappy about this, now would be the perfect time to address it with media rights in negotiation.

Expand full comment
jon joseph's avatar

The kids had a great time!

Bully for the kids. Off-site broadcasting and streaming will become the norm. One has to wonder with the cord-cutting going on as JC so well noted, whether FOX/ESPN will have the money to pay their respective various contracts already in place. I expect more terminations at both ESPN and FOX.

For youngsters out there, the norm back in the day when live sports were first broadcast on black and white TV on ABC, CBS, and NBC (the 3 available channels at the time that all shut down at midnight) you had one announcer on site in the booth. No color commentator in the booth or on the field.

The typical comment between plays in a football game: 'Bears, 3rd down and 6 to go." That was it.

No replay, and no review of any play calls. No sideline interviews or post-game interviews.

Growing up in Boston, we learned the results of the college games that were played west of the Mississippi on Saturday in the newspaper on Monday morning.

Back to the future?

Expand full comment
77 more comments...

No posts